Project: Source Properties of Earthquakes near Hydraulic Fracturing sites in northeast British Columbia
Earthquakes occur both naturally, and in response to stress perturbation due to reservoir stimulation during enhanced hydrocarbon recovery and waste-water injection. In the last few decades, several studies have shown clear correlation between reservoir stimulation and seismicity. We often find that the regions affected by events due to anthropogenic activities were hitherto ‘quiet’ as only a handful of background seismicity, often not felt, are reported. This has generated safety concerns regarding potential risk due to seismicity, mostly shallow, resulting from anthropogenic activities as they could produce large amplitude ground motion. The safety concerns are justified, however, they often cause discord between industry operators and the public.
As unconventional gas reserves account for ~80% of recoverable gas reserves in British Columbia (2015 BCOGC report), unconventional hydrocarbon recovery techniques are, presently, the most cost-effective means of exploiting these resources to meet energy demands. Therefore it is paramount to improve our understanding of deformational processes related to induced earthquakes by studying the source properties of earthquakes induced by reservoir stimulation. Information from this study would elucidate our understanding of earthquake processes and help us to adequately assess seismic hazard so as to better inform the public and assist both regulators and industry operators in promulgating policies that aim to reduce risk and improve overall safety. Some of the questions that this project aim to answer include:
- Do induce earthquakes behave similar to natural earthquakes? What source scaling relationship govern induced seismicity in our study area?
- How can we improve our detection of induced microseismicity? Can induced earthquakes help to identify fault structures including ‘blind’ faults?
- Is the double-couple assumption adequate to model slip/rupture induced by hydraulic fracturing operations? Can we lower the magnitude threshold of resolved fault plane solutions of induced events in regions with limited seismic station coverage? What orientation of crustal stresses drive deformation in our study area?
- How does the orientation of fault structures relative to injection well direction influence number and magnitude distribution of induced earthquakes. How can we modify hydraulic fracturing operational parameters such as horizontal wells direction and injection rate, to achieve balance between maximizing production and minimizing static shear stress enhancement on faults during injection runs?